Practice makes Professionals

Singapore’s Lien Foundation, which has a strong interest in education and the early childhood sector recently teamed up with one of the largest childcare providers, St. James’ Church Kindergarten to establish a Practicum Centre. That will allow trainee teachers a better experience as they learn to be teachers than they often currently receive.  With better mentoring and a sense of the profession they are entering, the hope is they will both be better teachers and make a career in a sector with a stubbornly high attrition rate.  Here is a piece on the importance of this I published in Today using data from a recent survey I conducted.

Practice Makes Professionals

by Trisha Craig

(op-ed published by Today, August 18, 2014)

Last week’s announcement by the Lien Foundation and St James’ Church Kindergarten that they would be launching a new Practicum Centre for pre-service pre-school teachers heralds a welcome addition to the early childhood education sector.

Designed to provide high-quality mentoring to student teachers during their mandatory classroom teaching, the new centre hopes to enhance the practical skill set of young teachers and help set the stage for a satisfying career as pre-school professionals.  Continue reading

Rising in the Ranks

Yesterday, the 2014 Shanghai Rankings, the influential global ranking of universities by Jiao Tong University in China, were released.  Singapore continued its upward rise as its two leading universities saw spectacular gains. The National University of Singapore (NUS) fell just short of breaking into the top 100 as it rose from 134 to 111, while Nanyang Technological University (NTU) now ranks 190th in the world, up from 269.

Singapore’s continued success comes at a time when the higher education landscape in Singapore is changing.  In order to meet the goal of raising the proportion of the young population with a university degree to 40% by 2020, which is comparable to the average in the OECD and up from 27% just two years ago, the government established the 5th autonomous (national) university, Singapore Institute of Technology last year and opened full time degree programs at another. The degrees at these institutions are mostly in applied fields and particularly geared to offer Polytechnic graduates the chance to top up their 3 year diplomas to bachelor’s degrees.

Raising the skills of the population is essential for Singapore to maintain its globally competitive position. But the always pragmatic Singaporean government seems to be signaling a shift in where it sees higher education going; it is now stressing that key skills need not necessarily come from a university degree.

Tomorrow’s National Day Rally (NDR), which is the annual occasion for the Prime Minister to lay out the policy priorities for the coming year, will take place at the Institute for Technical Education, a vocational and technical training institution, rather than at NUS where it is traditionally held. PM Lee Hsien Loong reportedly will focus on the importance of attaining skills though programs that combine study and work, not through a solely academic track.

Convincing parents that their children’s success in ultra-competitive Singapore does not require a degree will be a bit of an uphill battle as politicians recognize.  In advance of the NDR speech, Irene Ng, a Member of Parliament for the ruling party who sits on the Education Committee in Parliament is quoted in the Straits Times as saying: “a university degree is not a must-have to advance in life and do well. This will require quite a cultural shift in a society which has traditionally placed top emphasis on academic qualifications.”

But the alternative – too many degree holders for jobs that do not exist and a shortage of people with in-demand technical skills – would potentially slow the economy and create potentially greater public dissatisfaction than fewer degree places in universities.

As Singapore’s top universities rise in the global rankings, the country is also trying to raise the life chances of average citizens by expanding pathways beyond universities.

 

Not yours for the taking

(Op-ed published by Today, Aug. 1, 2014)

By Trisha Craig

Plagiarism, or taking other people’s words and ideas and passing them off as one’s own, has burst into the news in the past week. While many universities around the world consider it a silent epidemic, the very public transgressions of Mr Benny Johnson, a high-profile editor of popular Internet site Buzzfeed, and United States Senator John Walsh have cast a bright light on the issue of the proper attribution of source material and brought it into the open.

As unfortunate as these instances are, they act as a reminder that plagiarism can have severe and career-damaging consequences. In the case of the editor, his bosses fired him after finding more than 40 instances of plagiarism in his recent posts, while revelations that the Senator copied parts of his 2007 Master’s thesis at the prestigious US Army War College has put both his degree and re-election into jeopardy.

In higher education, faculty and administrators grapple with the issue of plagiarism which, while less headline grabbing, is commonly viewed as an endemic and growing problem on college campuses across the globe. Intellectual fraud does not occur only in the classroom — top universities now routinely check their admissions essays for pilfered paragraphs.

Many explanations for the rise in plagiarism are offered. They suggest a downward spiral that is hard to stop: Compared with the past, there is less social stigma, punishments are less harsh, detection is more difficult and pressures on students to excel are greater. In short, the risk and reward calculus has shifted and, as more people cheat and roughly get away with it, the numbers continue to rise. Continue reading …